Fact-Checking Policy
At fixArh magazine, we are dedicated to providing our readers with accurate, reliable, and well-researched content. Our commitment extends to every article, from guides on sustainable Italian furniture to analyses of architectural trends.
This policy outlines the rigorous steps we take to verify information before publication, ensuring the integrity of our editorial output.
Verification Process Before Publication
Every article published on fixArh.com undergoes a thorough fact-checking process. Our editors review all factual claims, statistics, dates, names, and quotes against reliable sources.
This verification happens before an article reaches its final publication stage. We cross-reference information from multiple independent sources whenever possible to confirm its accuracy.
Types of Sources Prioritized
fixArh prioritizes authoritative and credible sources to support all factual statements. Primary sources are preferred, such as original research papers, official government reports, and direct interviews.
We also rely on peer-reviewed academic journals, recognized industry publications, and statements from established organizations relevant to architecture, design, and sustainability. Commercial or promotional materials are treated with caution and verified independently.
How Claims Are Evaluated
Claims are evaluated based on the strength of the evidence supporting them. We assess the methodology of studies, the expertise of the source, and any potential biases.
Statements must be supported by verifiable data or direct observations. General assertions without concrete evidence are challenged and removed or revised to reflect their speculative nature.
What Happens When a Claim Cannot Be Verified
If a claim cannot be verified using reliable sources, it is not included in the published content. Our editorial team will either remove the claim or rephrase it to clearly indicate any uncertainty or lack of definitive proof.
We choose to omit information rather than present unverified facts to our readers. Transparency about what we know and what we do not know is central to our policy.
Distinction Between Fact and Opinion
fixArh maintains a clear distinction between factual reporting and editorial opinion within all content. Factual statements are supported by evidence and verifiable sources, as outlined in this policy.
Opinion pieces, commentaries, and reviews clearly label themselves as such. While opinions are welcome, they do not replace the need for accuracy in any accompanying factual assertions. Reader-submitted content also follows these guidelines.
Reader Reporting Process
We encourage our readers to help us maintain the highest standards of accuracy. If you believe an article contains a factual error or omission, please contact us immediately.
Send an email to [email protected], providing the article title, the specific claim you believe is incorrect, and any supporting evidence. Our editorial team will investigate your report within two business days.
Should an inaccuracy be confirmed, we will correct the article promptly and transparently. We appreciate your partnership in upholding the quality of fixArh magazine.
Last Updated: March 2026